DEVIL DOG: HOUND OF HELL
Curtis Harrington, TVmovie 1978, USA
DOG OWNERS! Does your non-Caucasian maid clutch her
cross when she sees your new puppy? Over time, do your children become giggly,
distant and callous? Does your wife suddenly become one half ice-maiden, one
half seductress? Do you sense EVIL behind your pet’s furry, indifferent visage?
Then, unfortunate owner, you may well be the owner of … a DEVIL DOG!
Director Curtis Harrington felt that “Devil Dog”
was ridiculous from the start, and so it is. But Harrington has no
understanding of the genre or the material; he is straightforward TV-style
director and has no imagination to know that the trick of horror is to embrace
the absurd. If done successfully, this can turn the preposterous into something
genuinely scary, black-humoured, even satirical and transcendent - like “The
Omen” and “The Exorcist”, the evident inspirations for below-par
fare such as this. A demonic dog that possesses a household could be fine
satire on bourgeois and/or suburban mores, but we do not get any of this. The
handsome dog generally looks cute. The characters are bland stock types, with
Kim Richards obviously far too old to play a ten year-old; and she isn’t the
only special effect that doesn’t work. Notoriously, the revelation of the devil
dog’s true form is bad stuff and badly filmed. Unintentional hilarity abounds.
The film is more successful, if at all, in small
moments when the kids grow increasingly alien to the parents, giggling
secretly, dashing off and behaving detached from adult affection and authority.
Perhaps the most genuine creepy scene is when the father (Richard Crenna) heads
up into the attic only to find that his family are indulging in black magic.
This inherent uneasiness of this moment hints at what might have been.
Why on earth would The Devil Himself want a pedigree
dog raped to spawn evil pups that… well, that just go into a family and cause
trouble? Is this spawned by the hubris of a Christian suburban family, thinking
That the Devil is directly interested in them and will always infiltrate in
some way, even through cute puppies? What on earth do the forces of Evil hope
to achieve? I can only venture that they want to start early on the son, who
enters school politics and, inevitably, appears to be using nasty means to
achieve success. But if the kid is meant to rise to Damien Thorn levels of
power, it isn’t clear, and starting in some undistinguished family and suburban
school does look like the forces of Evil are taking a longshot.
More fun and interesting is reading the narrative as
the insanity of the father. You see, it is actually him that is doing
the killing, suffering from paranoid delusions about his family and pet. It’s all in his head! There is even a
hint from an incidental television news report which states a man went on a
killing spree and said his dog told him too. But this is not the film to tease
out such ambiguous possibilities. Rather, it achieves that so-bad-it's-good accolades in both bad-horror and bad-TVmovie camps, so it certainly isn't without charm.
