Dead of Night
Directors ~ Alberto Cavalcanti, Charles Crichton
Basil Dearden, Robert Hamer
Writers ~ John Baines, Angus MacPhail, T.E.B. Clarke
1945 ~ UK
Stars ~ Mervyn Johns, Michael Redgrave, Roland Culver
‘Dead of Night’ was Ealing’s first post-war release and their only horror, despite other-wordly elements in others. Although preceded by the German film ‘Waxwork’ (1924), this is generally considered the precedent for the portmanteau genre. Amicus and Hammer owe an obvious debt, and its template can be sensed through to the recent ‘V/H/S’ franchise, but it would seem there really wasn’t a cohesive British Horror genre beforehand. There was Tod Slaughter as Britain’s first Horror star, barnstorming through ‘Maria Marten’ and ‘Sweeney Todd’, but no genre properly established. Previously a lot was being derived from theatre, and this certainly seems to be the case when we start here with a drawing room drama with cut-glass received pronunciation.
The over-arching tale of Walter Craig (Mervyn Johns) driving up in a in a 1938 Sunbeam-Talbot Ten drop-head coupe to a farmhouse to meet six people with an intrusive sense of déjà vu is strong. It’s not just bookending, it is an intrinsic narrative element itself, setting in motion the storytelling of the characters and justifying the incidental, anecdotal nature of the tales told. Where there are tonal shifts – creepy, romantic, dated comedy – the over-arching story keeps a momentum and cohesiveness that many anthologies don’t manage. The datedness offers the crisp Received Pronunciation dialogue, which is smart, spritely and engaging, endearingly old-fashioned. Drawing room debates punctuated by spooky anecdotes proves solid and arguably bolsters any slightness in the stories themselves. If wordy, educated slightly pricky drawing room banter appeals to you, ‘Dead of Night’ is rooted in this.
A notable omission is a lack of reference to the very recent war. During wartime, horror films had been banned in Britain, and by extension this has the air of asking to be let back in if we don’t mention it. Conspicuous by omission, perhaps, but Jamie Russel’s BBC synopsis is helpful:
"Best remembered for their classic British comedies, Ealing Studios broke all the rules with this spooky psychological thriller, their first post-war release. Released in 1945, its dark tales of neurosis and obsession proved the perfect response to the trauma of the war years with five stories by four different directors capturing a brooding menace that's quite at odds with the middle-class world of the stiff-upper-lipped characters."
Indeed, premonitions of death, fear of latent violence, suicide and cracked mental health all feature. Also at the time, the second story would have had period echoes of the infamous case of Constance Kent, a teenager who murdered her brother. There’s a lot of trauma lurking.
Although Googie Withers and Ralph Michael stand out, it is Michael Redgrave’s performance as the ventriloquist that steals the show in the film’s most renowned episode, although . It’s one that especially nods to the psychological basis and interiority of the Horror genre to come and not just the failing reality and hauntings of the other stories. All along, the film is in debate with its only foreign element, the German psychologist Dr Van Straaten (Frederick Valk) who insists on scientific explanations, but its agenda is definitely spookiness in showcasing several writers and directors. With the mirror and ventriloquist stories coming latterly, only interrupted rudely by the dated misogyny and buffoonery of golfers’ episode, the film only gets better as it goes on.
Much of the pleasure is the period detail and set-design, full of bric-a-brac from a different era, and it retains a timeless sense of atmosphere and some genuine eeriness. Having vanquished its symbol of rationality, the film succumbs to its nightmare logic. Along with its sense of a supernatural bubble-trap, its denouement not only gives a genuine nightmarish conclusion but also excels by giving the stories a second ending which, especially for the ventriloquist’s dummy episode (three chilling endnotes, by my count), proves a neat trick and greatly satisfying.