Pig
Director - Michael Sarnoski
Writers - Vanessa Block & Michael Sarnoski
Stars – Nicolas Cage, Alex Wolff, Adam Arkin
Anyone coming for shouty madcap Cage will be sorely disappointed,
because here he is totally in service to the prose of the film as a whole, not
just punctuation. It’s a quiet, towering Sasquatch of a performance. Going in
knowing very little – they steal his pig; he wants it back – I probably thought
it would go the ‘John Wick’, ‘Nobody’ route, and indeed it is filmed
with those beats in place, albeit in a very sombre register. But it’s not that
either, for it has different goals. For a start, it’s almost so washed out that
it’s austere, and it is slow, committedly serious and deliberate and ends on a
great, bare bones cover of Springsteen’s ‘I’m On Fire’. It’s a mood
piece.
(And I feel the need to put a reminder that you should stop reading now if you haven’t seen the film.)
Those action-revenge beats are in place: there’s illegal
fights, a wealthy nemesis, and Rob spends most of the film with a bloody beard
(which nevertheless doesn’t stop him from getting to a prestige restaurant; and
he must smell a treat too). And indeed, it’s as if John Wick’s superpowers were
a photographic memory and legendary culinary skills instead of super-assassin
past. Cage is Rob, a committed hermit with the required irascibility, earning
cash as a truffle hunter and selling to Alex Wolff. But these are characters to
be coloured-in, and the character study that emerges is one of a talented man
scarred irreparably by grief and a fatalism and over-sensitivity; an
over-sensitivity, we might guess, compounded and made unbearable by that
photographic memory. Rob’s intelligence and empathy becomes increasingly evident
and is never clearer than when he is confronting/talking to the restaurant chef
(a sublime scene between David Knell and Cage at the peak of their control).
It’s a film concerned with subtle shifts, and although
Alex Wolff as Amir is often shoved aside as a used and abused observer, and
although we don’t get to see it, one could imagine these events have changed
him more than anyone. His is a fine performance of natural empathy trying to
get out from under the veneer of bolshy business hotshot.
Where you might think it is leading to an explosive showdown of some kind… but the showdown is the making of a meal rather than a shootout. The methodology is repeatedly to set up an to undercut expectations. Again, the film follows the beats of a vengeance thriller, even to leaving him a hermit with his tapes which a shallow action film would see as a poignant character beat, but the residual feeling here is different: there’s no satisfaction of “he’s had his vengeance and now everything is back in its rightful place”. ‘Pig’ is after something else: a story of what we care about and the husks it makes of us when that’s taken away.
No comments:
Post a Comment