Thursday, 29 October 2026

Loving Vincent


LOVING VINCENT
Directors ~ DK Welchman, Hugh Welchman
Writers ~ DK Welchman, Hugh Welchman, Jacek Dehnel
2017,  Poland-United Kingdom-Switzerland-Netherlands-Qatar
Stars ~ Douglas Booth, Jerome Flynn, Robert Gulaczyk


The first fully oil painted film, made of 65000 paintings by over a hundred artists utilising Vincent Van Gogh’s techniques. With the use of Rotoscoping to give the characters a more realistic movement and expression, the effect is quite stunning. It took six years to complete, leading Co-director and producer HughWelchman to quip that ‘Loving Vincent’ had invented the slowest form of filmmaking ever devised in 120 years.

A romanticised and melodramatic tribute to Vincent Van Gogh presented like a whodunnit:  postman’s son tries to deliver the last undelivered letter from Vincent to his brother Theo after his death. It is very talky, and some critics find this a disservice to the remarkable visuals, but it seems a totally valid conceit to express the proposed mystery by making Van Gogh omnipresent by having the characters live in the worlds he painted. For this reason, it has an aesthetic purpose to challenge criticism of being a gimmick (it is no less gimmicky than, say, CGI dinosaurs for ‘Jurassic Park’, or Soderberg's 'Boyhood'). Although the balance would depend upon the viewer, the mystery plot mitigates the overwhelming visuals and the overwhelming visuals compensate for any narrative deficiencies – for example, the romanticisation of the tortured, misunderstood artist with mental health issues. It is reminiscent of a beautifully executed if traditional Nineteenth Century novella. However much the script is the focus of much criticism, it is due to the plot flow that the viewer becomes accustomed to the style until frequently catching themselves to contemplate and marvel at the highly organic and visceral feel of the oil paintings swarming, swirling and shimmering on the screen.

Perhaps an interview or two too long, there is enough ambiguity in conclusion to leave the mystery of Van Gogh lingering - although the consensus is suicide. The postman’s son’s journey from indifference to respect for Van Gogh parallels the viewing of viewers unfamiliar with Van Gogh work, although they will certainly recognise some characters – based on his portraits – and vistas just from osmosis with pop culture. ‘Loving Vincent’ may protest a mystery, but the residue is all sadness and the recognised influence Van Gogh’s work went on to have on the art world.

  

Sunday, 18 October 2026

Dark Star

DARK STAR
Director ~ John Carpenter
Writers ~ John Carpenter, Dan O'Bannon
1974, US
Stars ~ Dan O'Bannon, Dre Pahich, Brian Narelle

Blue collar slackers in space on a shoestring budget makes for a all-round amusing entertainment. The crew barely come out of their beards to express more than bored competence with their job, bickering and making daft and dangerous distractions for themselves while they look for new planets to blow up, just to meet quota and kill time. Famously, a student film expanded to full length and sporting a slightly amusing/ridiculous beach-ball alien, there is plenty of agenda and Carpenter director’s flare to make this a credible peer to other Seventies sci-fi favourites. It may not present his excellent trademark widescreen shots, but there’s a lot of canny framing with the claustrophobia and the basic effects having a charm of their own.

The crew act like burnouts that sort-of know each other after decades in space; indeed, they may be suffering the numbing mental repercussions of such employment. Sci-fi antecedents may have leaned on a shinier future, and ‘Star Wars’ may have looked lived in, but ‘Dark Star’ looked worked in, perhaps suffering from cut-backs, a detail capitalised on by writer/actor Dan O’Bannon for his following seminal credit, ‘Alien’. (‘Silent Running’ (1972) does this, and ‘Blade Runner’ (1982) arguably merges both for an urban retro-futurism.)

The lack of resources is easily mocked, but the indie stoner sensibility hasn’t dated, and the wit, writing, promise, limited production design and overall conception is more than competent, even if the pacing is a little stretched. There’s a real sense of artists really going for it despite limitations. It works as a satire on the pretensions of science-fiction by saying, yeh, but what if you had to work there? It has a smart counter-culture sensibility, affectionately satirising prestige genre fare.Variations on ‘2001: a space odyssey’s (1968) HAL, becoming one with the universe and cribbing the ending of Ray Bradbury’s short story ‘Kaleidoscope’ (1949) make for a strong conclusion, giving this enough dark humour and ludicrous detail for its solid reputation. A minor delight.


Sunday, 11 October 2026

Lost Highway

 

LOST HIGHWAY
Director ~ David Lynch
Writers ~ David Lynch, Barry Gifford
1997, France-USA
Cast ~ Bill Pullman, Patricia Arquette, John Roselius

After the negative reception to ‘Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me’, it took four years for ‘Lost Highway’ to be made. Anyone who came to ‘Fire’ on the back of the ‘Twin Peaks’ series might have been baffled, but anyone familiar with his earlier work, circa ‘Eraserhead’, would not have been. ‘Fire Walk with Me!’ and ‘Lost Highway’ returned to Lynch’s string of putting nightmares on screen, where a perpetual feeling of something not right, occasionally darkly funny, often terrifying and unknowable was predominant.

And Barry Gifford: author of hip, oddball crime stories, the types that ended up in ‘Wild at Heart’. Lynch came across the phrase “Lost Highway” in a Gifford novel and the term inspired them to throw ideas back-and-forth until they came up with the film story. Gifford felt ‘Lost Highway’ was more akin to ‘Eraserhead’. Rober Ebert concluded of ‘Lost Highway’: “This movie is about design, not cinema.” But Lynch’s doctrine was cinema is and as a feeling and vice versa: he insisted on it. ‘Lost Highway’s use of space, light, genre tropes and music strike me a wholly cinematic. Lynch quote: “Some things in life are not understandable, but when things in films are that way, people become worried.”* In interviews and in his in his idiosyncratic interviews and monologues, it is easy to see that to Lynch, the mystery was all.

Lynch has spoken of his inspiration for ‘Lost Highway’ as also being the OJ Simpson case and wondering how a murderer can go on after committing homicide. The answer here is very much a typical Lynchian Rorschach test, but an answer can be gleamed from three angles: reportedly, Gifford’s interpretation settled on the psychotic break; Patricia Arquette read it as the delirium of a man who hates women so much that he always ends up killing her in his fantasies; Lynch said it is only a part that we see, which certainly aligns into the reading of a reoccurring doomed romance Möbius strip narrative. There’s certainly a reality break.

Scenes set in Fred and Renee's mansion were filmed at Lynch's own home in the Hollywood Hills but amended for the feeling that a home is a labyrinthian maze of emotional detours and missteps. Certainly, its geography is hard to pin down. For me? We meet them at the end of untroubled lust, she seems to be going through the motions and he’s seething at the idea that she’s unfaithful: there’s paranoia and caution on both sides, it would seem. The mystery man signals not just Death, but homicide. Even at the gangster’s party, where they meet, he roams freely chatting to people (a good gag), his essence is back home and just waiting for Fred. Fred can’t handle that he’s murdered Renee – there’s all these ellipses (the fade-to-blacks being synonymous with black-outs) – even to the point where he can only see it on security camera footage. So he denies reality and turns himself into a younger, hipper guy, a vision taken from earlier Biker Youth Cool. But even then, the fabric of reality/film/genre keeps trying to shake the frame and turn him into someone else when the truth almost becomes too much even for his incarnation, Pete Dayton (Balthazar Getty). The truth can’t be denied. And that’s where we leave Fred: with nowhere to escape to, he tries to deny and morph again.

Lynch’s ability to be retro-hip takes on a new level here, having made the underside of picket-fence rock-n-roll Americana his own, with the shock of heavy metal introduced in ‘Wild at Heart’ alongside Elvis. Here, Bowie, Smashing Pumpkins, Trent Reznor, Lou Reed and Rammstein sit alongside a Lynch favourite, This Mortal Coil’s ‘Song to the Siren’** and the Angelo Badalamenti and Barry Adamson score. And there’s also Henry Rollins and Marilyn Manson in the cast, all of which adds Nineties street cred, alternative artist validation to Lynch’s visions. And then there was a ‘Lost Highway’ opera. Just the scope of this musical interest and his being so embraced by such influential cult figures shows how remarkable Lynch’s appeal to mystery was and still is for someone so unconventional. 

There’s a plague of toxic masculinity throughout Lynch’s work and ‘Lost Highway’ offers a more claustrophobic exploration of this topic than the cartoonish but scary malevolence of, say, Frank Booth or Bobby Peru. ‘Lost Highway’ is a prime example of Lynch’s forte with the symbolic and opaque nightmare narratives that rely upon their own internal logic and for the audience to negotiate by intuition rather than coherence. Its studied, almost somnambulistic pace quickly becomes fascinating and as immersive as it is baffling. As a psychological and cinematic puzzle, not necessarily meant to be solved, always surprising in its song choices and resistance to easy interpretation, ‘Lost Highway’ pointed to Lynch gleefully going down the rabbit hole as far he ever had  and rewards multiple viewings as a “psychogenic fugue”.

 ~

·     *    ‘Lost Highway’, Criterion booklet, excerpts from ‘Lynch on Lynch’ 2005, Chris Rodley.

·         ** We can be eternally grateful that Lynch did not have the budget to buy ‘Song to the Siren’ as it gave us his work with Julee Cruise and Badalamenti.


Tuesday, 1 September 2026

FrightFest 2026 - summary

 FrightFest 2026 - summary

Favourites:

‘Colony’

‘Imposters’

‘Drag’

‘The Glorious Dead’

‘You are the Film’

 

And:

‘Grind’ and ‘Ghost in the Cell’ for being such fun

‘Species’ for solid body-horror fun and work-life satire

Favourite scripts

‘Drag’

‘Imposters’

‘You Are the Film’

‘The Glorious Dead’

 

Favourite performances:

Tim McInnerny (‘Spider Island’)

Toby Poser (‘The Glorious Dead’)

Bill Camp (‘Ponderosa’)

Brandon Scott and Krsy Fox (‘Big Baby’)

 

Notes: 

‘Nervous’ – ear trauma.

‘Drag’ – back trauma and breeze blocks.

(once I realised the latter, I actually made an involuntary noise of horror.)

‘Colony’ – marvel at the pell-mell stuntmen/contortionists/dancers.

‘Ithaqua’ – I did jump when they found the mountain of meat.

‘Imposters’ – going in blind and the film taking a long game approach and thrilling to see where it would go.

 

I had a little panic and issue when buying my ticket, found myself in front row with delightful neighbours who were all as or more informed than me on the genre. I mean, where else would I go where everyone I met had seen ‘Beyond the Infinite Two Minutes’ and therefore excited to see the Makoto Ueda film? Hope my friends’ recommendations from the Discovery screens turn up on Shudder to catch up.

And now, John Higgins playing ‘Creepshow’ music to ease us out of another year of leaving reality behind for the refuge, insight and fun of genre films.