Heretic
Writers & Directors ~ Scott Beck, Bryan
Woods
2024, USA-Canada
Stars ~ Hugh Grant, Sophie Thatcher, Chloe
East
It’s obviously Hugh Grant’s tour-de-force, but Sophie Thatcher
and Chloe East are just as impressive. All three could have been 2D and that
would have served the purpose of a Fun Thriller, but Beck and Woods script is
more interested in these characters struggling with their beliefs. They are all
trying to impose their faith on one another, but it’s the girls that are
seemingly aware of the flaws in their Faith and absorb them.
Beck and Woods’ script goes through Gothicism,
philosophy, twistiness, social commentary, Escape Room dilemmas, parlour games,
clues and straight-up horror motifs (what’s in the basement?). It’s all to the
power of keeping the audience on their toes through speeches on Monopoly and
theism. It’s a bold film that halfway through tells the audience to settle down
to hear a lecture of derivations and reiterations (which is fascinating).
Grant pulls out the Goofy Britishness to winning
effect, but he conveys something frighteningly lost deep within his character,
something that makes him a mansplainer of the most toxic kind. It’s a self-aware
performance that says, “All this charm? It’s a mask.” His character is
one of those people that hold you hostage and batter you down with
passive-aggressiveness and the righteousness of their (conspiracy) theories
under the guise of having some salient points and criticisms. And moving
goalposts where necessary. And in the age of toxic social media interactions,
this feels a particularly zeitgeisty villainy.

Yet ‘Heretic’s aim is also obviously for genre
pleasure – whether mystery or horror or whatever – so it never feels preachy or
slacking. Even so, it’s the debates that are the strength – it’s very talky. Of
course, it has a cast that can keep up, from Grant’s posh boy passive
aggressive menace to Thatcher and East’s fully believable and sympathetic
Mormon girls. Their vulnerability and ordinary is tangible. There’s a criticism
of trying to forcibly impose your view upon others under the facade of debate, a
criticism of evangelism, and if the ultimate effect is fun over disturbance
that’s why it’s attracted allegations of shallowness. Even so, that’s also surely
going to propel it as a cult favourite.